Ramses X
Educator Kit
Protocols & launchpads

Plan a partner liquidity trial

Test a Ramses pool for your team’s trading or launch needs.

Open on RamsesLearn

Start with a clear need

Ramses provides swaps and liquidity pools across four documented networks.

Full notes

Bring your tokens to an existing liquidity venue

Ramses offers swaps and pool infrastructure across four documented deployments. A partner can assess whether a Ramses pool supports its trading, treasury or launch needs.

Choose a pool type

Match the pool design to how your tokens behave and who will manage the liquidity.

Full notes

Choose a compatible pool design

Legacy V2 and concentrated V3 are documented across Arbitrum, HyperEVM, Robinhood Chain and Polygon. DLMM is documented on Robinhood. Choose according to the asset behavior and intended management model.

Compare fees and actual results

The documented fee-only default allocates 95% of swap fees to LPs. Volume and fee levels determine income.

Full notes

Evaluate fee-only economics

The documented default retains 95% of swap fees for LPs. That is a fee-retention term, not evidence of more realized profit than an existing venue. Compare active depth, volume, routing and costs.

Bring the details for a first discussion

A useful brief names the market, funding, responsibilities, and desired result.

Full notes

Bring a concrete integration brief

Useful information for a first discussion:

  • Target chain, token contracts, expected users and launch flow.
  • Seed liquidity ownership, available capital and range-management responsibility.
  • Expected trade sizes, current routes and the execution quality you need.
  • Success metrics: usable depth, realized volume, fees and total costs.

Keep the first trial small

Start with one network, one token pair, and one trading or launch flow.

Full notes

Scope one pilot

Begin with one chain, one token pair and one launch or trading flow. State the problem the pilot is intended to solve: executable depth, a launch graduation destination, ongoing treasury liquidity or a fee-distribution workflow. Keep capital and incentive budgets explicit rather than implying an open-ended commitment.

  • Owner: who approves the integration and who operates it?
  • Market: token contracts, quote asset, intended starting price and expected trade sizes.
  • Liquidity: seed amount, funding source, position owner and range-management responsibility.
  • Review: start date, measurement period and the decision the pilot should inform.

Example: sharing collected fees

Assume $1,000 in gross fees belongs to an eligible fee-only position. A 95% LP share leaves $950 before further costs.

Full notes

Fee sharing · an arithmetic example

Assume $1,000 in gross swap fees attributable to a partner's eligible fee-only V3 position. At 95% LP retention, $950 is available before further costs. An illustrative 80% creator / 20% platform distribution of that $950 would give $760 and $190. The split is configured through a compatible collection and distribution integration; Ramses does not automatically pay every launchpad an 80/20 share.

Decide how to judge success

Agree on measurements before funding. Your team chooses the targets.

Full notes

Set measurable acceptance criteria

Agree on measurements before funding the pilot. Thresholds are partner decisions, not promises made by this kit.

  • Execution: output and price impact for agreed trade sizes and directions.
  • Activity: verified swap volume over the stated period and the routes actually used.
  • Economics: attributable gross fees, collected LP fees, incentive spend and operating costs.
  • Operations: position ownership, successful management or exit and fee-recipient reconciliation.
  • Capital use: liquidity active near relevant prices, with total TVL reported separately.

Report what happened and decide

Summarize the trial’s trading, liquidity, fees, and costs alongside your original goal.

Full notes

A decision-ready pilot readout

Report the original objective, capital deployed, observed execution, attributed volume, collected fees and total costs. Link the evidence for each figure. Finish with a concrete next decision: expand the same setup, revise a specific assumption or end the pilot. A higher fee-retention percentage alone is not enough to call the pilot successful.

Robinhood revenue buys RAM

Since October 14, 2026, all Robinhood protocol revenue routes to BuybackModule for market purchases of RAM. Sarcophagus is closed there.

Full notes

Robinhood protocol revenue → RAM buybacks

Since October 14, 2026, 100% of protocol revenue on Robinhood Chain is routed to BuybackModule; the Sarcophagus is closed there. Accumulated revenue funds taker-side market purchases of liquid RAM, which is sent to the dead address. This redirects protocol revenue, not all swap fees. The documented fee-only default remains 95% LPs / 5% protocol; the gauged default remains 100% of swap fees to voters, with configurable exceptions. Verify the chain, live pool configuration and execution receipts before making partner-facing claims. Planned emissions changes are not live terms.

Advanced Risk Check
  • Test the full trading and withdrawal flow, including ownership and fee collection.
  • Judge real results using trade quality, activity, fees, and costs—not the fee-share percentage alone.
  • Check whether a Ramses pool fits that need.
  • DLMM is documented on Robinhood; verify availability for your planned setup.
  • The documented fee-only default gives LPs 95% of swap fees. That percentage does not prove higher profit.
  • Confirm ownership, successful exits, correct fee recipients, and liquidity near the prices that matter.
  • Compare the original goal with the results and link evidence for each number.

Confirm each promised feature

Fee sharing, trade routing, incentives, and asset control each need a verified plan.

  • Check that the proposed integration works for your chosen deployment.
  • Confirm custom terms before presenting them as available.
Full notes

Verify before promising

Fee sharing, routing support, incentive plans and custody arrangements require their own confirmed design. Do not present an unverified integration or bespoke commercial term as already available.

Test the whole user journey

An existing pool does not prove that every step of an integration works.

  • Check the pool, tokens, approvals, starting price, deposit amounts, and position owner.
  • Test quotes, swaps, deposits, and withdrawals; compare results with transaction records.
  • Check any separate fee distributor’s permissions, recipients, and lock rules.
Full notes

Prove the complete route

A pool existing onchain is one part of an integration. Before describing the user flow as complete, verify that the intended interface can quote and execute against the correct liquidity and that ownership and fee handling work as designed.

  • Create or select the intended pool using the correct deployment contracts.
  • Check token compatibility, approvals, initial price, deposit amounts and position recipient.
  • Exercise representative quotes, then reconcile test swaps and liquidity actions with receipts.
  • If using a locker or distributor, verify its collection permissions, recipients and lock conditions independently.
Reference table
Illustrative fee-distribution ledger
StepAmount
Gross fees attributable to the position$1,000
LP share at assumed 95% retention$950
Creator share at illustrative 80% of LP fees$760
Platform share at illustrative 20% of LP fees$190

A compatible fee collection and distribution integration must implement the downstream split. These are example terms, before additional costs.

Next steps